Let's Talk Testing: Seeing is Believing in Fractographic Analysis


Reading time ( words)

One of the more common types of failure analysis is the investigation of something that has broken. For this column, we will be discussing a broken material, or, more commonly, a fractured or cracked material.

Fractographic analysis is sometimes perceived as a difficult analysis, given its roots in material science, but one might be surprised to learn that failure modes for this type of study are well-established and well reported and can easily be found in textbooks, reference materials, and even with a Google search!  Given that, this column is not being written to teach a lesson in fractographic failure modes, but more so to provide some insight in performing the analysis yourself, or at least give you some direction to get things started.

sellers0716.jpgUnlike many types of forensic analyses, a fractographic investigation most times doesn’t really need any high dollar, sophisticated instrumentation or equipment. This is true because the most pertinent information in a fracture based investigation is simply the visual examination of the fracture surface itself. Now, that can be problematic in some instances, because the fractured surface can become damaged before it is discovered. If a crack happens and is still connected on one end, it’s possible that the opposing surfaces of the fracture can make contact with each other—through movement of the specimen while still in use or even through simple vibration—potentially damaging the surface characteristics that are needed to determine the failure mode at hand. This is not overly common, but can happen, and as such it’s worth mentioning here. For this reason, one recommendation that can be made is…don’t put the pieces back together! In line with what has been mentioned just a few sentences ago, putting the fractured pieces back together can accidentally damage what you’re really trying to inspect.

Read the full column here.

 

Editor's Note: This column originally appeared in the July 2016 issue of The PCB Magazine. This is Keith’s first in a series of columns having to do with inspection and test— from the test lab perspective.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

PCB Surface Preparation Before Solder Mask on Non-copper Finishes

04/08/2020 | Nikolaus Schubkegel
A circuit board is made of copper. Usually, final finishes are applied after the solder mask process. In some cases, for special applications, the final finish may be applied before solder mask. In this case, we have solder mask on ENIG or galvanic nickel-gold. It is also possible to have tin or tin-lead under solder mask; this was an old technology that no longer plays a role today.

The Direction of MacDermid Alpha’s Automotive Initiative

04/02/2020 | Nolan Johnson, I-Connect007
Nolan Johnson speaks with Lenora Clark about MacDermid Alpha’s automotive initiative, where her role fits into the company’s focus on supporting carmakers in various business areas, and where the future of automotive is heading.

XRF: An Essential Tool to Help PCB Manufacturers Meet IPC Specifications

03/04/2020 | Matt Kreiner, Hitachi High-Tech
One of the main challenges in PCB manufacturing is to create a stable, long-term coating of the copper surface to perform critical functions throughout the expected lifetime of the part. The surface coating is there to do two things: prevent the copper from oxidizing by coming in contact with the air and form a reliable contact for a soldered joint or wire-bonded connector.



Copyright © 2020 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.